What time is it? How can we describe where architecture is at these days? That was a question that occurred to me a few years ago and so I thought I’d get my civil engineering students to find out for me. I set my next fresh class of kids in the materials science subject an introductory assignment about the difference between traditional, modern and post -modern. “Give me a definition of each and list the main materials used in each.” It was an interesting exersize, two dozen student papers are always interesting but a definite thread emerged.
Modern architecture was being proposed in the mid1800’s and became common in the early 1900’s. It is recognisable by its rectangular minimalist shapes, flat grey concrete, lots of glass, up on pillars, flat roofs, strip windows, often a roof garden. The famous slogan of modernism is “less is more”. Many social commentators say that the modern is a rejection of the past. None of the features of the past are allowed in the modern. There is no reflection of past currents or trends, its as if the page has been wiped clean.
Post-modern is a reaction against the total annihilation of the past that characterises modernism. The post-moderns cry “give us back our symbols”. A rootless, featureless existence is unbearable, a culture cannot be cut adrift from its foundations. And so the slogan for post-modernism has become “less is a bore” and late twentieth century architecture might look modern but has the occasional arch, parapet, bright colour. Not all post-modern architecture looks back beyond modernism but at least it looks for decoration with a range of materials or breaks the sheer flat planes of modernism into either shards or a mosaic. Melbourne’s Federation square is a good example of that. Its not really a return to the roots of our civilisation but that’s another story for another day.